I’m tempted to type with a lithp and write about thethe Modern Myths who go out Binge Drinking. They’re not like the Myths I used to know in my day. And boy don’t they grow up quickly thethe dayth?
Then I thought that I thould be more theriouth …oh sorry.. Try again Maggers.
Modern myths? Diana was murdered. The CIA blew up the Twin Towers. Car thieves stole a car with a dead body inside.
Are these really Myths?
Teaching Literature to Primary School Children we always used the following definition:
A myth, in its simplest definition, is a story with a meaning attached to it other than it seems to have at first; and the fact that it has such a meaning is generally marked by some of its circumstances being extraordinary, or, in the common use of the word, unnatural.”
This definition was made by John Ruskin, in 1869, in The Queen of the Air.
Close to what we used to teach the children.
What is my point you may wonder?
Well, simply that there is no such thing as a modern myth.
Now back to thothe Modern miths….
May 14, 2010 at 7:18 pm |
You make me long for the old days when I might have been considered a Modern Mith.
May 14, 2010 at 7:33 pm |
Anyone speed-reading this post would think you are drunk, on drugs, your Speller isn’t working or the whole computer is acting up.
As a former lisper I could read thith. Mosth otherth couldn’t.
May 14, 2010 at 8:11 pm |
I’m a mith, a very modern mith. In fact I’m so modern, the mith has not begun yet!
May 15, 2010 at 4:46 am |
So, is the idea of the modern myth a myth or am I mithing the point? I can’t think of anything particularly unnatural about the idea of the modern myth, so I suppose it isn’t.
So, what should we call these silly stories? Urban Legends? Apocrypha? Nope, they are apocryphal, but not Biblical, which is where the Apochrypha lie. See what your precision has done?
May 15, 2010 at 12:05 pm |
Bike Hike Babe, you are right: Magpie is on something. What he means is meth. No, not methadone, just old fashioned methanol – in Paris they call it Absynthe. Never stopped anyone so inclined to paint a masterpiece.
Lisps can be endearing – mainly when the lisper is twenty or younger. After that it’s an affectation.
Leaving Ruskin aside I am with you, Magpie: “Modern” myth is a contradiction in terms. Still, if Conrad validates it it exists. ‘Apocryphal’ – my foot.
U
May 15, 2010 at 12:15 pm |
Ursula, Is your Apocryphal foot a myth? If so what does it explain?
May 15, 2010 at 12:57 pm |
Grannymar, you are not mith. You are mitheth or at least used to be. But that mitheth the point doesn’t it?
Magpie, point well made indeed.
May 15, 2010 at 8:24 pm |
What about a Mithtreth?